PRESERVE, PROTECT and CONDEMN
by
FRANK M. GENNARO

"Preserve, Protect and Condemn explores the future of government controlled healthcare in America. The bad news is that you might not have one."

FRANK ON FRIDAY – Spy vs. Spy

I’ve long suspected that the Justice Department would not be defying Congressional demands for information unless they were covering up unprecedented wrongdoing by  government agencies.  We now know Donald Trump and his campaign were the targets of a multi-agency investigation which included the use of government informants.  And what’s worse, it appears that these informants (a/k/a “spies”)  planted the information that the government used to start the investigation.  The Democrats and the media deny the “spy” allegation as outrageous.  Democrat Congressman Adam (Bull) Schiff, says there’s no evidence spies were planted in the Trump campaign.  Based upon the Bull Schiff declaration, we can be confident that more than one spy was used.  Remember how this scandal has unfolded.  The Dems have denied everything, every step of the way.  When Donald Trump said he was wiretapped in Trump Tower, the media was outraged.  “It never happened,” they told us.  Consider the carefully chosen words of Obama ‘s National Security Advisor, Susan Rice, as reported in FonF on April 14, 2017, “There was no collection or surveillance on Trump Tower or Trump individuals, and by that I mean directed by the White House or targeted at Trump individuals.”  Remember those twisted words.  But Trump was right.  There were wiretaps.  And now  another part of the story was leaked to the New York Times, exposing more of the government coverup.  Spies were used to invade Trump world.  (Democrats prefer “confidential informants”)  Having utilized confidential informants on hundreds of investigations myself, I can attest that what they do is spy.)  These revelations would be comical were they not so dangerous.  In the Spring of 2016, before Trump even was nominated, the CIA began an investigation of Trump’s campaign.  When it was announced that Carter Page and George Papadopolous were to be Trump foreign policy advisors, CIA Director John Brennan sprang into action.  The American Spectator has pieced together the sordid timeline.  We were led to believe that the investigation began in May 2016, when Papadopolous told Australian envoy Alexander Downer Russia “had dirt” on Hillary Clinton, including her emails.  Now we know the truth.  In March 2016, the CIA arranged for one of their informants, British academic, Joseph Mifsud, to meet with Papadopolous.  In April 2016, Mifsud fed Papadopolous information that Russia had dirt on Hillary and her emails.  We know Mifsud was a CIA spy because Papadopolous pled guilty to lying about this meeting with Mifsud.  There would be no prosecution unless Mifsud was working for the government.  Coincidentally, Mifsud went missing last Fall.  In May 2016,  Downer sought out Papadopolous in a bar, and a drunken Papadopolous repeated to Downer what he learned from Mifsud .  Downer, who has connections to the Clinton Foundation, dutifully reported his words to the U.S. government.  Having entrapped Papadopolous into repeating information planted by the CIA, Brennan used the information he planted to launch the investigation into Trump world.  Brennan shared the information with James Comey, and the FBI launched Operation Crossfire/Hurricane, which was controlled by “the Langley Working Group,” a government task force including CIA, FBI, Treasury, Justice, the DNI (James Clapper) and the NSA.  Papadopolous later was introduced to a second CIA spy, Stefan Halper, who also passed on the “Russian dirt on Hillary” information to Papadopolous.  The CIA also sent an informant to meet with Carter Page in London, perhaps the same professor Halper.  The evidence that the CIA engineered the collusion narrative by itself planting the information, proved I was right last July, when I mused in FonF, “So try this one on for size. Trump is nominated, and Hillary buys the Trump dossier information from Fusion (GPS).  Now that the Democrats have retained the services of Fusion, they send lawyer Veselnitskaya to meet with Donald, Jr., she tells Junior nothing of value, and then the fact of the meeting is leaked to create a false Trump/Russia collusion story, permitting the Democrats to wiretap the Trump campaign. In this scenario, Hillary’s henchpersons created the original fake Russian collusion news, gave it to the Obama Justice Dept., which used it to spy on the Republicans, and fueled the continual fake news being peddled for truth by the fake news media. That’s not so farfetched.”  The Crossfire/Hurricane revelations demonstrate that the CIA had put the fix in long before the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting.  John Brennan leaked the fact of the ongoing investigation of Trump to Harry Reid, and Reid made it public.  In  addition to Donald Trump, it seems that Brennan also hated Trump’s National Security Advisor General Michael Flynn.  Brennan is so pro-Muslim that he refused to be sworn in as CIA Director on a Bible.  Flynn was dedicated to undoing the Obama/Ben Rhodes/ Brennan/Clapper reset of the Islamic world.  Brennan and Clapper decided to take Flynn out, and look what happened to Flynn.  In the face of all the Democrat denials of spying on Trump, James Clapper admitted to spying, but not on Trump, on those rascally Russians.  Spymaster Clapper comically declared that he doesn’t like the term “spying.”  Clearly, Brennan and his Crossfire/Hurricane co-conspirators conducted an outrageous spy campaign on an opposition presidential candidate.  If they really were doing it only to surveil Russians, Mueller wouldn’t be using the fruits of the spying to try to depose this President.  The coup attempt on Donald Trump implicates the entirety of the leadership of the Obama Administration, up to and including Obama himself.  How do we know this.  Back to Susan Rice.  On the day of Trump’s inauguration, Rice wrote a self-serving (and Obama serving) Memo to herself, documenting a January 5, 2017 meeting, “President Obama began the conversation by stressing his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue is handled by the Intelligence and law enforcement communities ‘by the book’.  The President stressed that he is not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective.  He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book.”  The Democrats like to compare the Russian collusion hoax to Watergate.  Now we know they’re right.  The Susan Rice, after the fact, attempt to exonerate Obama is reminiscent of Nixon’s March 21, 1973 Watergate tape.  In it, John Dean says it would take $1 million to keep the defendants quiet.  Nixon says, “we could get $1 million.  But it would be wrong.”  The Rice Memo is tantamount to an admission that Obama was part of the conspiracy.  The fish does stink from the head.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.